MANU/SC/0104/1993

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 930 of 1990, Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 97/91, 948/90, 966/90, 965/90, 953/90, 954/90, 971/90, 972/90, 949/90, 986/90 1079/90, 1106/90, 1158/90, 1071/90, 1069/90, 1077/90, 1119/90, 1053/90, 1102/90, 1120/90, 1112/90, 1276/90, 1148/90, 1105/90, 974/90, 1114/89, 987/90, 1061/90, 1064/90, 1101/90, 1115/90, 1116/90, 1117/90, 1123/90, 1124/90, 1126/90, 1130/90, 1141/90, 1307/90, Transferred Case (Civil) Nos. 27/90, 28-31/90, 32-33/90, 34-35/90, 65/90, 1/91. Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 1081/90, 343/91, 1362/90, 1094/91, 1087/90, 1128/90, 36/91, 3/91, IA No. 1-20 in Transferred Case (Civil) No. 27-35/90 and Writ Petition (Civil) No. 11/92, 111/92, 261/92

Decided On: 16.11.1992

Appellants: Indra Sawhney and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Union of India (UOI) and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
M.H. Kania, C.J., M.N. Venkatachaliah, S.R. Pandian, T.K. Thommen, A.M. Ahmadi, Kuldip Singh, P.B. Sawant, R.M. Sahai and B.P. Jeevan Reddy

ORDER

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.

1. Forty and three years ago was founded this republic with the fourfold objective of securing to its citizens justice, liberty, equality and fraternity. Statesmen of the highest order the like of which this country has not seen since - belonging to the fields of law, politics and public life came together to fashion the instrument of change - the Constitution of India. They did not rest content with evolving the framework of the State; they also pointed out the goal-and the methodology for reaching that goal. In the preamble, they spelt out the goal and in parts III and IV, they elaborated the methodology to be followed for reaching that goal.

2. The Constituent Assembly, though elected on the basis of a limited franchise, was yet representative of all sections of society. Above all, it was composed of men of vision, conscious of the historic but difficult task of carving an egalitarian society from out of a bewildering mass of religions, communities, castes, races, languages, beliefs and practices. They knew their country well. They understood their society perfectly. They were aware of the historic injustices and inequities afflicting the society. They realised the imperative of redressing them by constitutional means, as early as possible - for the alternative was frightening. Ignorance, illiteracy and above all, mass poverty, they took note of. They were conscious of the fact that the Hindu religion - the religion of the overwhelming majority - as it was being practiced, was not known for its egalitarian ethos. It divided its adherents into four watertight compartments. Those outside this fourtier system (chaturvarnya) were the outcastes (Panchamas), the lowliest. They did not even believed all the caste system - ugly as its face was. The fourth, shudras, were no better, though certainly better than the Panchamas. The lowliness attached to them (Shudras and Panchamas) by virtue of their birth in these castes, unconnected with their deeds. There was to be no deliverance for them from this social stigma, except perhaps death. They were condemned to be inferior. All lowly, menial and unsavoury occupations were assigned to them. In the rural life, they had n........