2021 ALLMR(Cri)1594 , 2021 (2 ) ALT (Crl.) 178 (A.P.), III (2021 )BC209 (SC ), 2021 (2 )BLJ(SC )226 , 2021 (4 )BomCR(Cri)321 , 2021 (1 )CivilCC(S.C. )599 , 2021 (1 )Crimes202 (SC ), 2021 (1 )CriminalCC358 , 2021 (2 )CTC357 , 2021 (1 ) Him. LR. (NULL ) 411 , 2021 (1 )ICC1001 (SC ), ILR2021 (1 )Kerala855 , 2021 INSC 72 , 2021 (1 )JKJ63 [SC ], 2021 (1 )KCCR545 , 2021 (2 ) KHC 517 , 2021 (5 )MhLj632 , 2021 (4 )MPLJ38 , 2021 (1 ) MWN (Cr.) D.C.C. 49 (NULL ), 2021 (1 )N.C.C.763 , (2021 )202 PLR746 , 2021 (2 )RCR(Criminal)160 , 2021 (2 )SCALE434 , (2021 )5 SCC283 , 2021 (1 ) SCJ 720 , [2021 ]165 SCL538 (SC ), [2021 ]1 SCR668 , 2021 (2 )UC647 , ,MANU/SC/0066/2021N.V. Ramana#Surya Kant#Aniruddha Bose#3371SC4870Judgment/OrderACR#AIC#Allahabad Criminal Cases#ALLMR (Criminal)#ALT (Criminal)#BC#BLJ#BomCR-CriV#CivilCC#Crimes#CriminalCC#CTC#Him. LR.#ICC#ILR (Kerala)#INSC#JKJ#KCCR#KHC#MANU#MhLJ#MPLJ#MWN (Cr.) D.C.C.#NCC#PLR#RCR (Criminal)#SCALE#SCC#SCJ#SCL#SCR#UCSurya Kant,SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2021-2-1125842,25846,16630,16759,25817,25843,16828,17060 -->

MANU/SC/0066/2021

True Court CopyTM English

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 123 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1876 of 2018)

Decided On: 10.02.2021

Appellants: Kalamani Tex and Ors. Vs. Respondent: P. Balasubramanian ..(+)

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose

JUDGMENT

Surya Kant, J.

1. Leave Granted.

2. M/s. Kalamani Tex (Appellant No. 1) and its managing partner-B. Subramanian (Appellant No. 2) are in appeal challenging the judgment dated 09.11.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, whereby the order of acquittal of the Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur was reversed and the Appellants have been convicted Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short, 'NIA'). Consequently, Appellant No. 2 has been sentenced to undergo three months Simple Imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/-.

Facts

3. The instant proceedings have originated out of a complaint preferred by P. Balasubramanian (Complainant-Respondent) against the Appellants. The Respondent is the proprietor of a garment company named and styled as 'Growell International', which along with Appellant No. 1 was engaged in a business arrangement, whereby they agreed to jointly export garments to France. Certain issues arose regarding delays in shipment and payment from the buyer, due to which, the Appellants had to pay the Respondent a sum of Rs. 11.20 lakhs. To that end, Appellant No. 2 issued a cheque on behalf of Appellant No. 1 bearing No. 897993 dated 07.11.2000 in favour of the Respondent and also executed a Deed of Undertaking on the same day wherein Appellant No. 2 personally undertook to pay the Respondent in lieu of the initial expenditure incurred by the latter. The Respondent presented the said cheque to the bank on 29.12.2000 for collection but it was returned with an endorsement that there were insufficient funds in the account of Appellants. In wake of the cheque being dishonoured, the Respondent issued a notice dated 08.01.2001 asking the Appellants to pay the am........