T89 (SC ), 2020 (4 ) CCC 296 (SC ), [2020 ]159 CLA357 (SC ), 131 (2021 )CLT325 , [2021 ]224 CompCas20 (SC ), (2021 )1 CompLJ1 (SC ), 2020 INSC 648 , 2020 (13 )SCALE176 , (2021 )2 SCC403 , [2021 ]164 SCL1 (SC ), [2020 ]11 SCR800 , ,MANU/SC/0876/2020S.A. Bobde#A.S. Bopanna#V. Ramasubramanian#317SC4520Judgment/OrderADJ#AIR#CalLT#CCC#CLA#CLT#CompCas#CompLJ#INSC#MANU#SCALE#SCC#SCL#SCRV. Ramasubramanian,Textile#TextileSUPREME COURT OF INDIA2020-11-20692388,692628,692389,692390 -->

MANU/SC/0876/2020

True Court CopyTM EnglishTrue Court CopyTM Hindi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 3735 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 5452 of 2020)

Decided On: 19.11.2020

Appellants: Kaledonia Jute and Fibres Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Axis Nirman and Industries Ltd. and Ors. ..(+)

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
S.A. Bobde, C.J.I., A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian

JUDGMENT

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Aggrieved by an order passed by the Company Court (High Court of Allahabad), refusing to transfer the winding up petition pending therein, to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT for short), a financial creditor has come up with this appeal.

3. Heard Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant, Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the 1st Respondent-corporate debtor and Gp. Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, learned Counsel appearing for the official liquidator.

Background Facts

4. One M/s. Girdhar Trading Co., the 2nd Respondent herein, filed a petition in Company Petition No. 24 of 2015 before the High Court of Allahabad Under Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, for the winding up of the first Respondent company, on the ground that the Company was unable to pay its debts. The Company Court ordered notice to the 1st Respondent herein, but the 1st Respondent failed to appear before the Company Court.

5. Therefore, by an order dated 08.01.2016 the Company Court ordered the admission of the Company Petition and also directed publication of the advertisement of the petition in accordance with Rule 24 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. Pursuant to the said order, the 2nd Respondent herein (petitioning creditor) effected a publication of the advertisement in the Official Gazette in Form No. 48 on 30.01.2016. Newspaper publications were also made, indicating the date of hearing of the Company Petition as 29.02.2016.

6. Thereafter, the Company Court passed an order dated 10.03.2016 directing the winding up of the 1st Respondent Company on the ground that the Company has been unable to pay its debts and that it was just and equitable to wind up the 1st Respondent Company.

7. By the aforesaid order dated 10.03.2016, the Company Court appointed the official liquidator attached to the High Court of Allahabad as the Liquidator and directed him to take over the assets and books of accounts of the Company. The order of winding up was also directed to ........