5 (152 )AIC19 (S.C. ), 2015 (3 )AJR835 , 2015 (90 ) ACC 690 , 2016 (1 ) ALT (Crl.) 59 (SC), 2015 (3 )BLJ(SC )213 , III (2015 )CCR205 (SC ), 2015 CriLJ3823 , 2015 (3 )Crimes83 (SC ), 2015 INSC 454 , 2015 (3 )JCC2146 (SC ), 2015 (2 )N.C.C.740 , 2015 (3 )RCR(Criminal)972 , 2015 (7 )SCALE358 , (2015 )11 SCC145 , 2015 (7 ) SCJ 50 , 2015 (2 )UC1290 , ,MANU/SC/0694/2015Pinaki Chandra Ghose#U.U. Lalit#211SC3020Judgment/OrderAD#AIC#AJR#Allahabad Criminal Cases#ALT (Criminal)#BLJ#CCR#CriLJ#Crimes#INSC#JCC#MANU#NCC#RCR (Criminal)#SCALE#SCC#SCJ#UCU.U. Lalit,SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2015-7-216125,15817,16482,16759 -->

MANU/SC/0694/2015

True Court CopyTM English

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal Nos. 1506 and 2409 of 2009

Decided On: 01.07.2015

Appellants: Kamla Kant Dubey and Ors. Vs. Respondent: State of U.P. and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Pinaki Chandra Ghose and U.U. Lalit

JUDGMENT

U.U. Lalit, J.

1. These appeals by special leave challenge the judgment and order dated 15.05.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Reference No. 6/2008 and in Criminal (Capital) Appeal No. 3588 of 2008 acquitting the Respondents accused of the charges Under Sections 302 read with 34 Indian Penal Code.

2. According to the case of the prosecution:

A) One Brahmadeen Dubey owned lands in District Mirzapur in State of Uttar Pradesh. Under two sale deeds, he sold two parcels of land admeasuring 10 bighas and 6 bighas to Rama Kant Dubey and Sushil Kant Dubey respectively. Two registered deeds in this behalf were executed on 02.02.1993. However, it came to the notice that there was already a sale deed executed on 09.09.1992 in respect of very same lands in Kolkata in favour of Basant Lal Dubey and others. This led to the filing of Civil Suit No. 160 of 1993 by Brahmadeen seeking cancellation of sale deed dated 09.09.1992, submitting, inter alia, that the deed in question was a sham document which was obtained by setting up an imposter in place of the owner i.e. Brahmadeen Dubey.

B) On 16.11.1994, brother-in-law of Brahmadeen named Kedar Nath Dubey was murdered while sons of Kedar Nath were also injured in the transaction. In respect of said incident, Basant Lal Dubey and his three sons Lalji, Gyan Prakash and Om Prakash were facing trial for having caused the murder of Kedar Nath and injuries to his sons.

C) Civil Suit No. 163/1993 was at an advanced stage of trial. The matter depended upon the testimony of Brahmadeen. Around this time, Brahmadeen was assaulted with lathi and dandas by Basant Lal Dubey and his sons, Lalji, Om Prakash, Gyan Prakash. In respect of said assault a separate case was registered and was also going on.

D) Brahmadeen aged about 90 years was living with the sons of Kedar Nath Dubey on whom he depended because of his old age.

E) On 26.11.1998 at about 8.00 in the morning PW1 Kamla Kant Dubey, son of Kedar Nath Dubey alongwith Brahmadeen had gone to ease out at some distance from the village. At that time Basant Lal and his sons Lalji, Om Prakash and Gyan Prakash came on a tractor driven by Om Prakash from a small road along side a Canal. Lalkara was given by Basant Lal that the old man........