, 2017 (2 ) ALD(Crl.) 898 (SC ), 2017 (3 )BLJ(SC )43 , 2017 (3 )BomCR(Cri)550 , II (2017 )CCR432 (SC ), 2017 CriLJ4008 , 2017 (4 )Crimes8 (SC ), 2017 (3 )ECrN (NULL ) 1 , 2017 (3 )J.L.J.R.98 , 2017 (3 )MLJ(Crl)18 , 2017 (3 )N.C.C.538 , 2017 (3 )PLJR113 , 2017 (2 )RCR(Criminal)901 , 2017 (6 )SCALE21 , (2017 )8 SCC1 , 2017 (6 ) SCJ 54 , [2017 ]3 SCR630 , 2017 (2 )UC1322 , ,MANU/SC/0586/2017Arun Mishra#Amitava Roy#260SC3050Judgment/OrderAIC#AIR#ALD(Cri)#BLJ#BomCR-CriV#CCR#CriLJ#Crimes#ECrN#JLJR#MANU#MLJ(Criminal)#NCC#PLJR#RCR (Criminal)#SCALE#SCC#SCJ#SCR#UCArun Mishra,SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2017-5-12Contents of charge,Form of Charges,The Charge,Separate charges for distinct offences,Form of Charges,The Charge,Joinder of Charges,Trial for more than one offence,The Charge,Criminal Procedure16917,16746,57726,57737,16657,15913,16250,16263,16314,16315,16318,16324,16325,16645,16653,16654,16655,16759,16312,16698,28246,16615,16218,16219,16652,16247,16253,45938,25570,15793,15985,340414,446616,24023,593319,593321,15858,16613,57728,15912,16249,16656,23618,26902 -->

MANU/SC/0586/2017

True Court CopyTM English

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal Nos. 394, 393 and 395 of 2017

Decided On: 08.05.2017

Appellants: State of Jharkhand through S.P., CBI Vs. Respondent: Lalu Prasad and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy

JUDGMENT

Arun Mishra, J.

1. The appeals arise out of three separate judgments and orders of learned Single Judge of High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi discharging three Accused persons namely; Lalu Prasad Yadav, Sajal Chakraborty and Dr. Jagannath Mishra on the ground of their conviction in one of the criminal cases arising out of fodder scam of erstwhile State of Bihar. Applying the provision Under Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 300 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Cr.PC'), the High Court has quashed RC No. 64A/96 against Lalu Prasad Yadav, four cases against Dr. Jagannath Mishra being RC Nos. 64A/96, 47A/96, 68A/96 and 38A/96 and two cases against Sajal Chakraborty being RC Nos. 20A/96 and 68A/96 on the ground that they have been convicted in one of the cases for offences involving the same ingredients with respect to Chaibasa treasury.

2. In the wake of large scale defalcation of public funds, fraudulent transactions and fabrication of accounts in Animal Husbandry Department of State of Bihar popularly known as fodder scam, Central Bureau of Investigation (for short, 'the CBI') investigation had been ordered by this Court in State of Bihar and Anr. v. Ranchi Zila Samta Party and Anr. MANU/SC/0384/1996 : (1996) 3 SCC 682 to investigate corruption in public administration, misconduct by the bureaucracy, fabrication of official records, misappropriation of public funds by an independent agency. This Court directed CBI to do investigation and inform the Chief Justice of Patna High Court. On the re-organisation of the State of Bihar by virtue of Bihar Re-organisation Act, 2000, States of Bihar and Jharkhand were formed. ........