Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
T.S. Thakur and Gyan Sudha Misra

JUDGMENT

T.S. Thakur, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The short question that falls for determination in these appeals by special leave is whether the High Court was right in declining the prayer made by the Appellant for a direction in terms of Section 427 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the sentences awarded to the Appellant in connection with the cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed against him to run concurrently.

3. The material facts are not in dispute. The Appellant is a Director in a group of companies including Arawali Tubes Ltd., Arawali Alloys Ltd., Arawali Pipes Ltd. and Sabhyata Plastics Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant's case before us in that in connection with his business conducted in the name of the above companies, he had approached the Respondent, Haryana Financial Corporation for financial assistance and facilities. The Corporation had accepted the requests made by the Companies and granted financial assistance to the first three of the four companies mentioned above. Several cheques towards repayment of the amount borrowed by the Appellant in the name of the above companies were issued in favour of the Haryana Financial Corporation which on presentation were dishonoured by the banks concerned for insufficiency of funds. Consequently, the Corporation instituted complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the Appellant in his capacity as the Director of the borrowing companies. These complaints were tried by Judicial Magistrates at Hissar culminating in the conviction of the Appellant and sentence of imprisonment which ranged between 6 months in some cases to one year in some others besides imposition of different amounts of fine levied in each complaint case and a default sentence in the e........