AWC4809 SC , 2016 (III )CLR299 , 2016 (4 )ESC653 (SC ), [2016 (150 )FLR930 ], 2016 INSC 578 , 2016 LabIC3731 , (2016 )III LLJ513 SC , 2016 (7 )SCALE611 , (2016 )2 SCC(LS)559 , 2016 (7 ) SCJ 298 , [2016 ]4 SCR24 , 2016 (4 )SCT272 (SC ), 2017 (2 )SLR623 (SC ), ,MANU/SC/0859/2016S.K. Singh#R. Banumathi#28SC3020Judgment/OrderAIR#AWC#CuLR#ESC#FLR#INSC#LabIC#LLJ#MANU#SCALE#SCC(LS)#SCJ#SCR#SCT#SLRS.K. Singh,Transport and Logistics#Transport and LogisticsSUPREME COURT OF INDIA2016-8-1065732,54377,20223,54255,17302,65749 -->

MANU/SC/0859/2016

True Court CopyTM English

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 4703 of 2009

Decided On: 08.08.2016

Appellants: PEPSU Road Transport Corporation and Ors. Vs. Respondent: S.K. Sharma and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
S.K. Singh and R. Banumathi

JUDGMENT

S.K. Singh, J.

1. This appeal by special leave assails the judgment and order dated 24.04.2006 passed by a Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing LPA No. 700 of 2002 preferred by the Appellants and affirming the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 11.01.2002 whereby Writ Petition bearing CWP No. 11908 of 1992 preferred by some of the Respondents was allowed. Some had preferred to file suits and Civil Appeals which were dismissed. Their Regular Second Appeal No. 430 of 1995 was tagged with the above writ petition and was allowed by the same common judgment enabling all the 21 Respondents to refund a part of CPF (Govt. Contribution) or agree for adjustment, to obtain pensionary benefits.

2. The Respondents filed the writ petition in 1992 claiming that they were appointed originally in a department of PEPSU described as PEPSU Roadways, between January 1955 and September 1956. It is not in dispute that in the PEPSU Roadways the Respondents' appointment was only on temporary basis. PEPSU Roadways lost its utility due to creation of PEPSU Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the 'Corporation'). Copy of notification dated 07.01.1956 available on record shows that Corporation was created by this notification under the provisions of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 enforced with effect from 10.08.1954. The State Government through the Chief Secretary issued a letter dated 16.10.1956 informing the General Manager, PEPSU Roadways, Patiala (with reference to PEPSU Roadways' communication dated 14.10.1956) that His Highness the Rajpramukh had ordered the transfer of PEPSU Roadways to the PEPSU Road Transport Corporation (with effect from 15.10.1956 forenoon) on various terms and conditions in respect to evaluation of the assets of the PEPSU Roadways as well as sharing the burden for payment of the employees of the Corporation. The letter indicates that the Corporation was requested to draw up the agreement required by Clause (h) of Sub-section (2) of Section 19 of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 and forward the same to the Government for approval and signatures. On account of the States Reorganization Act the merger of State of PEPSU with the State of Punjab became effective from 01.11.1956. Through an Order No. 61 dated 30.11.1956 the Corporation admitted that PEPSU Roadways stood ta........