Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Adarsh Kumar Goel, Navin Sinha and Rohinton Fali Nariman

JUDGMENT

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos. 1375-1376 OF 2013

1. These appeals have been put up before this Bench of three Judges in pursuance of order of Bench of two Judges dated 9^th September, 2013 as follows:

Leave granted.

Learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that there is considerable difference of opinion amongst different Benches of this Court as well as all the High Courts. Mr. Ram Jethmalani, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Petitioner in Criminal Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 6470 of 2012 submits that the subsequent decisions rendered by the two-judge Benches are per incuriam, and in conflict with the ratio of law laid down in the Constitution Bench decision in Mohanlal Maganlal Thacker v. State of Gujarat [  MANU/SC/0071/1967 : (1968) 2 SCR 685].

In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that it would be appropriate if the matters are referred to and heard by a larger Bench. Office is directed to place the matters before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders.

In the meantime, further proceedings before the trial Court shall remain stayed.

2. Since the question of law to be determined is identical in all cases, we have taken up for consideration this matter. In the light of answer to the referred question this as well as all other matters may be considered for disposal on merits by the appropriate Bench.

3. Brief facts first. F.I.R. dated 7^th March, 2001 has been recorded with the Delhi Special Police Establishment: CBI/SIU-VIII/New Delhi Branch Under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477A of Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with