Anoop Kumar Mendiratta DECISION
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
1. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated January 30, 2020 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, whereby the Tribunal has allowed the Original Application ('O.A.', in short) and directed the petitioners herein to grant the respondents the second ACP benefits from due dates on notional basis and revise their pension payment order and pay the pension accordingly. The arrears have been limited to the last three years i.e., w.e.f. January 01, 2017 onwards without any interest.
2. The facts as noted from the record are, the respondents were appointed as Compositor Grade-II in Letter Press Unit ('LPU', in short), Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi in the pay scale of ` 3050- ` 4590/-(revised) at various points of time. The respondent No. 1 was appointed on October 23, 1972, the respondent No. 2 was appointed on October 16, 1974 and the respondent No. 3 was appointed on July 30, 1979. The next promotion post was that of Compositor Grade-I, which carried the pay scale of ` 4000- ` 6000/-.
3. It is the case of the parties that due to technological changes, the LPU in the press which was manually operated got changed to Photo Litho Unit ('PLU' in short), which is basically a computer based system. The respondents were declared surplus in LPU and were re-deployed to the PLU. The designation in PLU was corresponding to the designation of Compositor Grade-I in LPU, called Offset Plate Maker and it was also in the pay scale of ` 4000- ` 6000, i.e., same as that of Compositor Grade-I. All the respondents were redeployed as Offset Plate Maker between January 08, 1998 to January 10, 1998. This was the first financial upgradation granted to the respondents.
4. The Assured Career Progression Scheme ('ACP Scheme' in short) came into being for all Central Government employees w.e.f. August 09, 1999. This scheme was also applicable to Government of India Press and envisaged two financial upgradation in 12 and 24 years of service if one was not promoted in this period.
5. The grievance of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 was that on August 09, 1999, when the ACP Scheme came into being, they had already completed 24 years of service and were granted only one financial upgradation by that time. Accordingly, they were due for second ACP benefits on that date, which has not been granted. The respondent No. 3 was due for second ACP w.e.f. July 30, 2003, but was not granted.
6. When the 6th CPC was implemented w.e.f. January 01, 2006, the regime of Pay Band and Grade Pay was introduced. For the pay scale of ` 4000- ` 6000/-, the corresponding Grade Pay was ` 2400/-. All the respondents were granted the next higher Grade Pay of ` 2800 w.e.f. January 01, 2006 and it was counted as a financial upgradation. Thereafter, the MACP came to be implemented w.e.f. September 01, 2008, which envisages three financial upgradations on completion of 10/20/30 years of service, if, one was not promoted during these years. The respondents were granted third ACP benefit by way of Grade Pay ` 4200/-. Subsequently, the respondents retired from the service in the year 2014.
7. It is in respect of denial of second ACP benefits on completion of 24 years of service that the respondents had filed the O.A. before the Tribunal.
8. The ca........