on>Ramesh Nair#10CS500MiscellaneousMANURamesh Nair,TRIBUNALSAdjudicating Authority#Appeal#authorized representative#Bench#Board#Board Circular#Carbon Black#Cement#CENVAT#CENVAT credit#Component#Credit#Date#Goods#India#Information#Inputs#Order#Place of Removal#Record#Remand#Removal#Report#Representative#Service#Superintendent#Tax#Transportation2022-5-2 -->

MANU/CS/0095/2022

IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Excise Appeal No. 10243 of 2019

Decided On: 29.04.2022

Appellants: Phillips Carbon Black Limited Vs. Respondent: C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-II

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Ramesh Nair

DECISION

Ramesh Nair, Member (J)

1. The issue involved in the present case is that whether the appellant is entitled for cenvat credit in respect of outward GTA for period prior to 01.04.2008.

2. Shri Anandoday Mishra, Learned counsel along with Ms. Chaitali Sadayat, Advocates appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that from 01.04.2008 in the main clause of the definition of the input service, the service related to removal of inputs was "from the place of removal", which was amended as "up to place of removal". Therefore, prior to 01.04.2008 the cenvat credit on outward GTA was available. He placed reliance on the following judgments:

• PARTH POLY WOOVEN PVT. LTD.- (Tax Appeal No. 419 of 2010)

• GODFREY PHILIPS INDIA LIMITED (Appeal No. ST/138/2008)

• ABB LTD. ( APPEAL NO. ST/336/2007, ST/345, 347/2006)

• GULF OIL CORPORATION LTD. (APPEAL NO. E/10995/2019-SM)

• H.M.M. LIMITED- (MANU/SC/1196/1995 : 1995 (76) ELT 497 (SC))

• VASAVADATTA CEMENTS LIMITED.(CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11710 OF 2016)

• M/S. CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED- (E/1412/2011-SM)

• M/S. GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.

• PHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD. (TAX APPEAL NO. 832 OF 2015)

• PIRAMAL HEALTHCARE LTD. (SERVICE TAX APPEAL NO. 85315 OF 2019).

3. Shri G. Kirupanandan, Learned Superintendent (Authorized Representative) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings in the impugned order. He submits that even prior to 01.04.2008 certain criteria to fulfill for allowing the Cenvat Credit on Outward GTA was prescribed in Board Circular No. 97/8/2007-ST : MANU/DSTX/0073/2007 dated 23.08.2007. He submits that the appellant have not submitted the documents to satisfy the criteria for allowing credit as prescribed in aforesaid Board Circular. He also placed reliance on the following judgments:

• COMMISSIONER OF CCE & ST Vs. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD- MANU/SC/0065/2018 : 2018 (9) G.S.T.L. 337 (S.C.)

• MAHLE ENGINE COMPONENTS INDIA PVT. LTD.- 2018-TOIL-3677-CESTAT-DEL

• MAHLE ENGINE COMPONENTS- 2019-TOIL-2805-JC-MP-CX (APPEAL AGAINST ORDER REPORTED AT 2018-TOIL-3677-CESTAT-DEL).

• MAHLE ENGINE COMPONENTS- 2020-TOIL-132-SC-CX-LB.

• SANGHI INDUSTRIES LTD.- MANU/CS/0050/2019 : 2019 (369) ELT 1424 (Tri.- Ahmd).

• ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD- TAX APPEAL NO. 691 of 2019.

• SANGHI INDUSTRIES LTD.-(SLP (C) No. 11239/2020).

4. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. I find that prior to 01.04.2008, the services related to removal of the goods was "from the place of removal" which was replaced as amended with effect from 01.04.2008 as "up to the place of removal". Therefore, the Cenvat Credit prima facie is available in case of outward transportation for the services availed from the place of removal up to the customers place. However, I also agree with Learned Authorized Representa........