0 , 2021 (6 )ALD154 , IV (2021 )BC349 (SC ), 2021 (5 )BLJ(SC )99 , 2021 (5 )BomCR18 , 2021 (3 ) CCC 281 (SC ), [2021 ]228 CompCas102 (SC ), 2023 (5 )CTC305 , 2021 INSC 359 , 2021 (4 )KLJ94 , (2021 )6 MLJ220 , 2021 (3 )RCR(Civil)711 , (2023 )3 SCC753 , [2021 ]167 SCL610 (SC ), [2021 ]6 SCR772 , ,MANU/SC/0487/2021Indira Banerjee#V. Ramasubramanian#231SC3020Judgment/OrderAIC#AIR#ALD#BC#BLJ#BomCR#CCC#CompCas#CTC#INSC#KLJ#MANU#MLJ#RCR (Civil)#SCC#SCL#SCRIndira Banerjee,SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2021-7-30692447,692388,692385,692446,674208,692381,692384,692389,692395,692390,692387,340367,57476 -->

MANU/SC/0487/2021

True Court CopyTM English

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 2231 of 2021

Decided On: 26.07.2021

Appellants: Orator Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Samtex Desinz Pvt. Ltd.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian

JUDGMENT

Indira Banerjee, J.

1. This appeal Under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the IBC) is against the final judgment and order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi in Company Application (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1064 of 2020 dated 08-03-2021, whereby the NCLAT has been pleased to dismiss the appeal of the Appellant and confirmed the order dated 23.10.2020 of the Adjudicating Authority, i.e., the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, dismissing the petition being CP(IB) No. 908/ND/2020, filed by the Appellant Under Section 7 of the IBC with the finding that the Appellant is not a financial creditor of the Respondent. The Appellant is an assignee of the debt in question.

2. The short question involved in this Appeal is, whether a person who gives a term loan to a Corporate Person, free of interest, on account of its working capital requirements is not a Financial Creditor, and therefore, incompetent to initiate the Corporate Resolution Process Under Section 7 of the IBC.

3. M/s. Sameer Sales Private Limited, hereinafter referred to as to "Original Lender", advanced a term loan of Rs. 1.60 crores to the Corporate Debtor for a period of two years, to enable the Corporate Debtor to meet its working capital requirement. The Original Lender has assigned the outstanding loan to the Appellant.

4. According to the Appellant the loan was due to be repaid by the Corporate Debtor in full within 01.02.2020. The Appellant claims that the Corporate Debtor made some payments, but Rs. 1.56 crores still remain outstanding.

5. The Appellant filed a Petition Under Section 7 of the IBC in the NCLT for initiation of the Corporate Resolution Process. The petition was, however, rejected by a judgment and order dated 23.10.2020. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) held:

11. Heard the parties and perused the case records<........