Navin Chawla DECISION
Navin Chawla, J.
The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Assessment Order dated 31.03.2021 passed under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against the petitioner under the E-Assessment Scheme, 2019 for the Assessment Year 2017-18.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Impugned Assessment Order is liable to be set aside inasmuch as it is not preceded by the issuance of a 'Draft Assessment Order' followed by a 'Revised Draft Assessment Order'.
3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr. Puneet Rai, learned counsel for the respondent. He raises a preliminary objection on the maintainability of the present petition, contending that the petitioner has already challenged the impugned assessment order by way of an appeal. He further submits that in absence of a provision akin to Section 144B (9) of the Act, issuance of a Draft Assessment Order cannot be held to be mandatory and failure to issue such order cannot be treated as fatal.
4. As far as the maintainability of the present petition is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said appeal was filed only to ensure that the period of limitation is not crossed. He submits that as the impugned order has been passed without jurisdiction, the remedy of a writ petition would be available to the petitioner. In support of his submission, he places reliance on the judgment dated 04.06.2021 passed by the predecessor Bench of this Court in Gurgaon Realtech Limited vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (earlier National E-Assessment Centre Delhi) - W.P.(C) No. 5849/2021.
5. He further submits that absence of a provision akin to Section 144B (9) of the Act from the Scheme would not be of much relevance in as much as the Scheme has been framed under Section 143(3A) of the Act and is mandatory to be followed by the Authorities.
6. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties.
7. It is not denied by the learned counsel for the respondent that the Impugned Assessment Order was not preceded by the Draft Assessment Order.
8. Clause 5 (1) (viii) and (x) of the E-Assessment Scheme, 2019 are reproduced hereinunder:
"5. Procedure for assessment.- (1) The assessment under this Scheme shall be made as per the following procedure, namely:-
xxxxxx
(viii) the assessment unit shall, after taking into account all the relevant material available on the record, make in writing, a draft assessment order either accepting the returned income of the assessee or modifying the returned income of the assessee, as the case may be, and send a copy of such order to the National e-assessment Centre;
xxxxxx
(x) the National e-assessment Centre shall examine the draft assessment order in accordance with the risk management strategy specified by the Board, including by way of an automated examination tool, whereupon it may decide to-
(a) finalise the assessment as per the draft assessment order and serve a copy of such order and notice for initiating penalty proceedings, if any, to the as........