MANU/SC/0168/2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal Nos. 1827, 1875, 1832 and 3213 of 2018

Decided On: 09.03.2021

Appellants: Canon India Private Limited Vs. Respondent: Commissioner of Customs

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
S.A. Bobde, C.J.I., A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian

JUDGMENT

S.A. Bobde, C.J.I.

1. This batch of statutory appeals (being Civil Appeal Nos. 1827/2018, 1875/2018, 1832/2018 and 3213/2018) Under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 arises from a common final order of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('CESTAT') dated 19th December 2017 ('impugned order').

2. Vide the impugned order an exemption of basic customs duty accorded to the Digital Still Image Video Cameras ('DSIC') imported by the Nikon India Pvt. Ltd., Canon India Pvt. Ltd., Sony India Pvt. Ltd. and Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'Appellants' or 'importers'), in terms of exemption Notification No. 20/2005 : MANU/CUSN/0021/2005 dated 01.03.2005 (as amended by Notification No. 15/2012 : MANU/CUST/0071/2012 dated 17.03.2012) came to be denied and the consequential confiscation of goods, demand of interest and imposition of penalty as provided for under various Sections of the Customs Act, 1962, was upheld by the CESTAT.

3. Since the appeals involve common questions, these are being decided together and for sake of convenience we shall be referring to the events which took place in the case of Nikon.

4. The main issue is whether after clearance of the cameras on the basis that they were exempted from levy of basic Customs duty under Notification No. 15/2012 : MANU/CUST/0071/2012, the proceedings initiated by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence for recovery of duty not paid Under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 are valid in law.

Exemption Notification

5. Exemption to Digital Still Image Video Cameras was issued on 1.3.2005 vide Notification No. 25/2005 (and amended vide Notification No. 15/2012 : MANU/CUST/0071/2012 on 17.3.2012).

Arrival and decision to clear the goods on payment of nil duty

6. The consignment of cameras arrived at Delhi on 15.3.2012. The importer submitted a Bill of Entry to the Customs Authorities on 20.3.2012. Along with the Bill of Entry, the importer submitted a covering letter and literature containing specifications of the cameras. After verification of the Bill of Entry by the Inspector and the Superintendent, the importer requested the Deputy Commissioner of Customs for a first check on 21.3.2012. The Customs Authorities checked the goods on 24.3.2012. They compared the goods with the description given in the literature and took a decision to clear the goods on 24.3.2012, as being exempt from duty i........