Krishna Murari JUDGMENT
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
1. The sole question of law for consideration in the present appeals is whether in case of a valid driving licence, if the licence has expired, the insured is absolved of its liability.
2. The facts are in a very narrow compass. The first Respondent herein, met with an accident on 20.5.1999 while driving a truck owned by the Appellant herein, under whom he was gainfully employed. The consequence for the first Respondent was 20 per cent permanent disability. The first Respondent herein filed a petition under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Compensation Act') before the Commissioner, Sadar, Bilaspur on 17.2.1999 seeking compensation of an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/-, impleading the Appellant and second Respondent herein - the insurance company which had insured the vehicle. These proceedings resulted in an award by the Commissioner on 8.12.2004 granting Rs. 94,464/- for the injuries suffered and Rs. 67,313/- towards medical expenses of the first Respondent. The amounts awarded were to carry interest @ 9 per cent per annum from the date of filing of the application till the date of payment. The compensation amount was mulled on to the second Respondent as insurer, while the interest was directed to be paid by the Appellant herein.
3. The parties to the proceedings all filed appeals aggrieved by different aspects of the award. An intrinsic part of the consideration by the High Court was the issue raised about the validity of the driving licence of the first Respondent at the time of the accident. The driving licence was endorsed by the Superintendent of R & LA Office, Udaipur but the licence expired on 6.9.1996 and there was no endorsement for renewal thereafter. Thus, the first Respondent was driving the vehicle as the driver of the Appellant herein for almost three years without the licence being renewed.
4. The aforesaid aspect of the non-validity of the driving licence weighed with the High Court while passing the impugned judgment dated 3.3.2009, absolving the insurance company of any liability and fastening the same upon the Appellant herein on account of there being a material breach of the insurance policy.
5. The High Court, after the aforesaid finding took note of Section 4 of the Compensation Act, more specifically the following aspect:
4. Amount of compensation -
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the amount of compensation shall be as follows, namely:
(a) Where death results from the injury | An amount equal to fifty per cent of the monthly wages of the deceased workman multiplied by the relevant factor; or An amount of eighty thousand, whichever is more; |
(b) Where permanent total disability results from the injury | An amount equal to sixty per cent of the monthly wages of the injured workman multiplied by the relevant factor, or An amount of ninety thousand rupees, whichever is more. |
Explanation I.-- Fo........