S. Abdul Nazeer JUDGMENT
Arun Mishra, J.
1. These appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 14.11.2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, (for short 'the NCLAT') in Company Appeal (AT) No. 411 of 2018, thereby affirming the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (for short 'the NCLT') concerning maintainability of the applications filed Under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').
2. The case is the outcome of a family tussle. Late Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal, during his lifetime, held as many as 53,53,960 shares in M/s. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd., a listed company. He breathed his last on 29.3.2016 in Russia. On or about 18.6.2015, Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal filed a nomination according to Section 72 of the Act in favour of Mrs. Aruna Oswal, his wife. Two witnesses duly attested the nomination in the prescribed manner. As per the Appellant, it was explicitly provided therein that: "This nomination shall supersede any prior nomination made by me/us and any testamentary document executed by me/us." The name of Mrs. Aruna Oswal, the Appellant, was registered as a holder on 16.4.2016 as against the shares held by her deceased husband.
3. Mr. Pankaj Oswal, Respondent No. 1, filed a partition suit being C.S. No. 53/2017 claiming entitlement to one-fourth of the estate of Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal. He claimed one-fourth of the deceased's shareholdings who was holding shares to the extent of 39.88% in Oswal Agro Mills. Ltd., Respondent No. 2. The deceased also held 11.11% shares in M/s. Oswal Greentech Ltd., Respondent No. 16. The partition suit was filed on 3.2.2017 by Respondent No. 1 for 1/4th each of 39.88% shareholding in Respondent No. 2 company and 11.11% shareholding in Respondent No. 16 company. Prayer was made for an interim injunction in the civil suit. The High Court vide order dated 8.2.2017 directed the parties to maintain the status quo concerning shares and other immoveable property. As on 8.2.2017, the shares stood registered in the ownership of Mrs. Aruna Oswal, who continues to be the owner of the shares.
4. After the demise of Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal, Respondent No. 1 entered into the corporate offices of Respondent Nos. 2 and 16 along with his wife for which a criminal complaint was lodged. FIR No. 54/2016 was registered at Police Station Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. As a counterblast, Respondent No. 1 also filed a criminal complaint against the Appellant as well as the officials of Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 16 companies, alleging illegal transmission of shares. The application filed by Respondent No. 1 for registration of the FIR was dismissed vide order dated 13.8.2018, and the revision petition filed against the said dismissal is pending.
5. Mr. Pankaj Oswal, Respondent No. 1 filed Company Petition No. 56/CHD/PB/2018 - Pankaj Oswal v. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. and Ors., alleging oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of Respondent No. 2 company. A prayer was also made against M/s. Oswal Greentech. Ltd. Respondent No. 1 claimed eligibility to maintain the petition on the ground of being a holder of 0.03% shareholding and claiming entitleme........