Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Ashok Bhushan and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the Assessee challenging the Division Bench judgment dated 13.11.2007 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur by which D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 837 of 1993 filed by the Revenue has been allowed upholding the demand of additional tax Under Section 143(1-A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2. Brief facts necessary to be noted for deciding this appeal are:

The Assessee is a Government Company as defined Under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee filed return on 30.12.1991 for the assessment year 1991-92 showing a loss amounting to Rs. (-)4,27,39,32,972/-. Due to a bonafide mistake the Assessee claimed 100% depreciation of Rs. 3,33,77,70,317/- on written down value of assets instead of 75% depreciation. Under the unamended Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Assessee was entitled to claim 100% depreciation. However, after the amendment the depreciation could only be 75%. The Assessee supported the returns with provisional revenue account, balance sheet as on 31.03.1991, details of gross fixed assets, computation chart and depreciation chart. No tax was payable on the said return by the Assessee. No notice Under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was received by the Assessee.

3. An intimation Under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 12.02.1992 was issued by the Assessing Officer disallowing 25% of the depreciation, restricting the depreciation to 75%. Additional tax Under Section 143(1-A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 amounting to Rs. 8,63,64,827/- was demanded. The Assessee filed an application Under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 18.02.1992 praying for rectification of the demand. The Assessee also filed a petition Under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the demand of additional tax. In the petition it was stated that even after allowing only 75% of depreciation the income of the Assessee remained to be in loss to Rs. 3,43,94,90,393/-. The Assessee prayed for quashing the demand of additional tax. The application filed Under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was rejected by the Assessing Officer on 28.02.1992. The revision petition Under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 came to be dismissed by the Commissioner of Income Tax by order dated 31.03.1992. The Commissioner of Income Tax rejected the revision petition by giving following reasoning:

A plain reading of the provisions of Section