Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
B.C. Ray and K. Jagannatha Shetty JUDGMENT
K. Jagannatha Shetty, J.
1. We grant special leave and proceed to dispose of the appeal.
2. Shobha Rani is the appellant. Her husband is Madhukar Reddy who is respondent before us. The wife is postgraduate in biological sciences. The husband is a medical doctor. They were happily married on December 19, 1982. But their happiness did not last longer. They started exchanging letters with bitter feelings. Then they began to accuse each other. At one stage, they thought of winding up by mutual consent. It was perhaps out of disgust. It would have been better, if it had happened. But unfortunately, it did not materialise. Ultimately they landed themselves in the Court. The wife moved the Court for divorce on the ground of cruelty.
3. Before referring to further facts, let us consider the law. The cruelty simpliciter is now a ground for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (Act 25 of 1955). Section 13 provides, so far as it is material:
13. Divorce.- (1) Any marriage solemnized whether before or after the commencement of this Act, may, on a petition presented by either the husband or the wife, be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground that the other party....
(i) ....
(i-a) has, after the solemnization of the marriage treated the petitioner with cruelty; or
XXX XXX XXX XXX
4. Section 13(1)(i-a) uses the words "treated the petitioner with cruelty". The word "cruelty" has not been defined. Indeed it could not have been defined. It has been used in relation to human conduct or human behaviour. It is the conduct in relation to or in respect of matrimonial duties and obligations. It is a course of conduct of one which is adversely affecting the other. The cruelty may be mental or physical, intentional or unintentional. If it is physical the court will have no problem to determine it. It is a question of fact and degree. If it is mental the problem presents difficulty.
First, the enquiry must
begin as to the nature of the cruel treatment. Second, the impact of such treatment in the mind of the spouse. Whether it caused reasonable apprehension that it would be harmful or injurious to live with the other. Ultimately, it is a matter of
inference to be drawn by taking into account the nature of the conduct and its effect on the complaining spouse. There may, however, be cases where the conduct complained of itself is bad enough and per se unlawful or illegal. Then the impact or the injurious effect on the other spouse need not be enquired into or considered. In such cases, the
cruelty will be established if the conduct itself is proved or
admitted.
5. It will be necessary to bear in mind that
there has been marked change in the life around us. In matrimonial duties and responsibilities in particular, we find a sea change. They are of varying degre........