C4023 SC , 2011 (3 )CTC532 , 2011 (2 )ESC380 (SC ), 2011 INSC 311 , (2011 )6 MLJ998 , 2011 (4 )SCALE733 , (2011 )6 SCC570 , (2011 )2 SCC(LS)140 , [2011 ]5 SCR460 , 2011 (3 )SCT10 (SC ), 2011 (2 )SLJ229 (SC ), 2011 (4 )SLR465 (SC ), 2011 (2 )UJ1625 , (2011 )3 UPLBEC2036 , ,MANU/SC/0435/2011P. Sathasivam#B.S. Chauhan#2344SC3340Judgment/OrderAIC#ALR#AWC#CTC#ESC#INSC#MANU#MLJ#SCALE#SCC#SCC(LS)#SCR#SCT#SLJ#SLR#UJ#UPLBECB.S. Chauhan,SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2012-9-24Statutes dealing with substantive rights,General principles,Retrospective Operation,Operation of Statutes,Interpretation of Statutes27019,27021,27023,27024,17177,28215,27001,16910,16912,28221,26995,26998 -->

MANU/SC/0435/2011

True Court CopyTM EnglishUJ

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 3299 of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 16427 of 2009)

Decided On: 18.04.2011

Appellants: J.S. Yadav Vs. Respondent: State of U.P. and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
P. Sathasivam and B.S. Chauhan

JUDGMENT

B.S. Chauhan, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is focused animadverting upon the judgment and order dated 21.4.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 27315 of 2008, by which the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Appellant, challenging the Notification dated 28.5.2008, by which on the date of reconstitution of the U.P. State Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'Commission'), the Appellant was declared to have ceased to hold the office as a Member of the said Commission.

3. Compendiously and concisely, the relevant facts necessary and germane to the disposal of this appeal run as under:

(A) Appellant entered the U.P. Judicial Services as Munsiff in the year 1972 and was promoted to the post of Additional District Judge in the year 1985 and further promoted to the post of District Judge w.e.f. 14.1.2003.

(B) The Appellant while working as a Principal Secretary and Legal Remembrancer, Government of U.P., was appointed as a Member of the Commission on 29.6.2006 for a period of five years i.e. till 30.6.2011. The Appellant joined on the said post on 1.7.2006.

(C) Sections 21, 23, 25 and 26 of The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (hereinafter called 'the Act 1993'), stood amended vide The Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to 'Amendment Act 2006'). The said amendment came into force on 23.11.2006.

(D) After completion of the tenure by the then Chairperson of the Commission and other Members in October 2007, the Appellant remained the lone working Member of the Commission. The State of U.P. issued Notification dated 28.5.2008 to the effect that Appellant ceased to hold the office as a Member of the Commission.

(E) The Appellant challenged the said Notification dated 28.5.2008 by filing Writ Petition No. 27315 of 2008, mainly on the grounds that he had been appointed for a tenure of five years and that period could not be curtailed. The amendment Act 2006 could not take away the accrued rights of the Appellant as he had been appoi........