Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi and Navin Sinha

JUDGMENT

Ranjan Gogoi, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave by the landlord is against the order dated 7^th December, 2016 passed by the Calcutta High Court in a proceeding under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred as "the 1997 Act") for eviction of the Respondent-tenant on the ground that the tenant had defaulted in payment of his share of municipal tax as an occupier under the provisions of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1980 Act"). The application filed by the landlord was dismissed by the learned Trial Court which view has been upheld in appeal by the High Court.

3. The matter lies in a very short compass and the question arising may be formulated as hereunder:

Whether after the amendment of the West Bengal premises Tenancy Act by Amendment Act No. 14 of 2001 with effect from 10^th July, 2001 [which had incorporated Sub-section (8) to Section 5] whether a tenant who defaults in payment of his/her share of municipal tax as apportioned by the landlord would be in default of rent rendering him/her liable to eviction.

4. The rent agreement governing the parties in the present case was executed in the year 1991. Under the said agreement the parties had agreed that the rent would include all municipal taxes payable and that as and when such taxes are enhanced rent should be proportionately raised. However, with the amendment of the Act with effect from 10^th July, 2001 and after incorporation of Sub-section (8) of Section 5 the obligation to pay the municipal tax/taxes was specifically cast on the tenant in his/her capacity as an occupier. Sub-section (8) of Section 5 is in the following terms:

5. Obligations of tenant.-

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

(8) Every tenant shall pay his share of municipal tax as an occupier of the premises in accordance with the provisions of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 (West Bengal Act LIX of 1980) or the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 (West Bengal Act XXII of 1993).

5. In the present case, the property tax payable in respect of the suit property was reassessed and enhanced. There were several tenants in occupation of the suit property. The landlord apportioned the tax between the tenants and issued a notice dated 7^th February, 2003 upon the Respondent-tenant to pay his share of the municipal taxes. The Respondent-tenant by reply dated 29^th March, 2003 to the said notice had sought for a reconsideration/review of the matter on a "co-operative spirit for the sake of harmonious relation between tenant and landlord." As the Respondent-tenant had not remitted the amount due as his share of the municipal tax, the landlord instituted the proceedings for eviction on the ground of default of payment of rent on the part of the Respondent-tenant.

6. The learned Trial Court dismissed the claim of the landlord on ........