C 31 , (1972 )1 SCC618 , [1972 ]3 SCR289 , ,MANU/SC/0412/1972
C.A. Vaidialingam#G.K. Mitter#I.D. Dua#3362SC4860Judgment/OrderAIR#INSC#MANU#SCC#SCRG.K. Mitter,FMCG#FMCGSUPREME COURT OF INDIA2012-9-24Trade Marks,Permanent Injunction,Trade Marks,Mandatory/Prohibitory Injunction,Rules of comparison,Infringement of registered Trademarks,Effect of Registration,Similarity with earlier Trade Marks; Similar goods and services,Relative grounds for refusal of registration,The Register And Conditions For Registration,Similarity with earlier Trade Marks; Similar goods and services,Relative grounds for refusal of registration,The Register And Conditions For Registration,Difference between civil remedies for Trade mark infringement and passing off,Infringement Action,Appeals,Infringement Action,Intellectual Property Rights,Law of Injunction875,755,756,726 -->
MANU/SC/0412/1972
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal No. 1051 of 1967
Decided On: 28.01.1972
Appellants: Parle Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Respondent: J.P. and Co., Mysore
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
C.A. Vaidialingam, G.K. Mitter and I.D. Dua JUDGMENT
G.K. Mitter, J.
1. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Mysore High Court confirming the dismissal of a suit for an injunction restraining the respondent from infringing the registered trade mark of the plaintiffs used on packets of biscuits.
2. The facts are as follows. The plaintiffs-appellants before us are manufacturers of biscuits and confectionery and are owners of certain registered trade marks. One of them is the word "Glucose" used on their half pound biscuit packets. Another registered trade mark of theirs is a wrapper with its colour scheme, general set up and entire collocation of words registered under the Trade Marks Act 1940 as No. 9184 of 7th December, 1942. This wrapper is used in connection with the sale of their biscuits known as "Parle's Glucose Biscuits" printed on the wrapper. The wrapper is of buff colour and depicts a farm yard with a girl in the center carrying a pail of water and cows and hens around her on the background of a farmyard house and trees. The plaintiffs claim that they have been selling their biscuits on an extensive scale for many years past under the said trade mark which acquired great reputation and goodwill among the members of the public. They claimed to have discovered in March 1961 that the defendants were manufacturing, selling and offering for sale biscuits in a wrapper which according to them was deceptively' similar to their registered trade mark. The plaintiffs assert that this act of the defendant constitutes an infringement of their trade mark rights. As in spite of lawyer's notice the defendants persisted in manufacturing, selling and using the wrappers complained of with regard to their biscuits, the plaintiffs filed the suit claiming injunction as already mentioned.
3. The defendants pleaded ignorance of the registration of the trade marks claimed by the plaintiffs. They denied that the wrapper used by them in connection with the sale of their biscuits was deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' trade marks as alleged or that they had in any way infringed the trade mark rights of ........