MANU/SC/1352/2005

True Court CopyTM EnglishTrue Court CopyTM GujaratiUJ

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal Nos. 4937-4940 and 4941-44 and 4945 of 1998

Decided On: 26.10.2005

Appellants: State of Gujarat and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
R.C. Lahoti, C.J., B.N. Agrawal, Arun Kumar, G.P. Mathur, C.K. Thakker and P.K. Balasubramanyan, JJ. and ( A.K. Mathur

JUDGMENT

R.C. Lahoti, C.J.

1. Section 2 of the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1994 (Gujarat Act No. 4 of 1994) which introduced certain amendments in Section 5 of the Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1954 (as applicable to the State of Gujarat) has been struck down as ultra vires the Constitution by the High Court of Gujarat. These three sets of appeals by special leave have been filed there against.

A chain of events, legislative and judicial, lead to the impugned enactment. To appreciate the core issue arising for decision in these appeals and also the constitutional questions arising therein, it will be useful to set out the preceding events in their chronological order.

PART - I

Backdrop of Events

Legislative history leading to impugned enactment

2. With a view to conserve the cattle wealth of the State of Bombay, the State Government enacted the Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1948 and prohibited slaughter of animals which were useful for milch, breeding or agricultural purposes. This Act was substituted by the Bombay Animal Preservation Act of 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Bombay Act'). The provisions relevant for our purpose are contained in Sections 5 and 6. Sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of Section 5 and Section 6 are extracted and reproduced hereunder :

"5. (1) Notwithstanding any law for the time being in force or any usage to the contrary, no person shall slaughter or cause to be slaughtered any animal unless, he has obtained in respect of such animal a certificate in writing from the Competent Authority appointed for the area that the animal is fit for slaughter.

(2) No certificate shall be granted under Sub-section (1), if in the opinion of the Competent Authority--

(a) the animal, whether male or female, is useful or likely to become useful for the purpose of draught or any kind of agricultural operations;

(b) the animal, if male, is useful or likely to become useful for the purpose of breeding;

(c) the animal, if female, is useful or likely to become useful for the purpose of giving milk or bearing offspring.

(3) Nothing in this section shall apply to the slaughter of any animal above the age of fifteen years for bona-fide religious purposes :

Provided that a certificate in writing for such slaughter has been obtained from the Competent Authority.

(4) xxx xxx xxx

(5) xxx xxx x........