1987 LabIC262 , 1986 (2 )LLN11 (SC ), 1986 (1 )SCALE1077 , (1986 )2 SCC679 , [1986 ]2 SCR17 , 1986 (2 )SLJ1 (SC ), 1986 (1 )SLR712 (SC ), ,MANU/SC/0066/1986A.P. Sen#D.P. Madon#R.S. Pathak#3MANU/SC/0104/1993557SC4750Judgment/OrderAIR#INSC#LabIC#LLN#MANU#SCALE#SCC#SCR#SLJ#SLRD.P. Madon,SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2012-9-24General principles,Liberal Construction of Remedial Statutes,Remedial and Penal Statutes,Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Religion, race, caste, sex or place of Birth.,Right to Equality,Fundamental Rights,Equality of Opportunity in Matters of Public Employment.,Right to Equality,Fundamental Rights,Constitution of India,Interpretation of Statutes17060,17163,17336,16957,16912,17075,16946,17067 -->

MANU/SC/0066/1986

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 2952 of 1984

Decided On: 01.04.1986

Appellants: Comptroller and Auditor-general of India, Gian Prakash, New Delhi and Ors. Vs. Respondent: K.S. Jagannathan and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
A.P. Sen, D.P. Madon and R.S. Pathak

JUDGMENT

D.P. Madon, J.

1. This Appeal filed by Special Leave granted by this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution is directed against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeal No. 409 of 1982 and raises a question of importance to the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes working in the Department of Indian Audit and Accounts who seek promotion to the Subordinate Accounts Service.

2. The Respondents belong to the Scheduled Castes and are working as Selection Grade Auditors in the Department of Indian Audit and Accounts at Madras. The next promotional post for them is that of Section Officer in the same Department and in order to obtain such promotion, Selection Grade Auditors are required to pass the Subordinate Accounts Service Examination (hereinafter referred to as "the SAS Examination"). The SAS Examination consists of two parts, namely, Part I and Part II. Both the Respondents have passed the Part I Examination held in December 1979. They appeared for the Part II Examination in December 1980. Both of them secured the minimum number of marks in each individual subject which was 40 per cent and in some papers more than the minimum number of marks but failed to secure the aggregate minimum which was 45 percent. The First Respondent secured 42.4 per cent and the Second Respondent 40.8 per cent.

3. The Respondents thereupon filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, being Writ Petition No. 10706 of 1981, in the Madras High Court praying for a writ of mandamus directing the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India and the Accountant General-I, Madras - the Appellants before us - to make in accordance with the instructions contained in the Office Memorandum No. 36021/10/76-Estt.(SCT) dated January 21, 1977, issued by the Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms to all Ministries etc. suitable relaxation for the Respondents in the qualifying standard of marks for Part II of the SAS Examination held in December 1980 and to declare them as having passed the said examination. The said writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs by a learned Single Judge of the High Court. The Respondents thereupon........