MANU/SC/0003/1954

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 193 of 1952

Decided On: 21.05.1954

Appellants: Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos and Ors. Vs. Respondent: The Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Sudhi Ranjan Das, Ghulam Hasan and B. Jagannadhadas

JUDGMENT

Sudhi Ranjan Das, J.

1. It will be convenient at this stage to discuss and deal with a preliminary point raise by the learned Attorney-General appearing for the plaintiffs respondents. In order to appreciate and deal with the point so raised it will be necessary to take note of the changed conditions that had been brought about in the matter of the judicial administration in the State by the recent political changes culminating in the adoption of the new Constitution of India. It will be recalled that the present review application was made on the 22nd August, 1946, and a notice to show cause was issued on the 4th December, 1947. The preliminary question as to the maintainability of the review application was decided on the 29th June, 1949. During all this period Regulation IV of 1099 was in force in the State of Travancore. Section 11, omitting the explanations which are not material for our present purpose, and section 12 of that Regulation provided as follows :

"11. (1) A Full Bench shall hear and decide all appeals from the decrees of the District Courts in suits in which the amount or value of the subject-matter is not less than five thousand rupees and the amount or value of the matter in appeal is not less than that sum. The judgment of the Full Bench or the judgment of the majority, if there be difference of opinion, together with the records of the case, shall be submitted to us in order that the judgment may be confirmed by Our Sign Manual.

(2) Notwithstanding anything in the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, the date of the decree shall be the date on which the judgment is declared in open Court after being confirmed by Our Sign Manual.

Explanation I...................

(a).............................................................

(b).............................................................

(c)..............................................................

Explanation II..................

12. In cases decided under section 11 of this Regulation a Full Bench of the High Court may admit a review of judgment subject to the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. If, on review, a fresh judgment be passed, the provisions of section 11 shall, as far as may be, apply."

2. It will be seen that under section 12 if a fresh judgment be passed then the provisions of section 11 shall, as far as possible, apply, that is to say, the judgment shall have to be submitted to the Maharaja for confirmation by his Sign Manual and the judgment so confirmed shall have to be declared in open Court after such confirmation. This was the position until the end of June, 1949. In the meantime on the 29th May, 1949, came the Covenant of merger between the Rulers of Travancore and Cochin with the concurrence and guarantee of the then Governor-General of India for the formation as from the 1st July, 1949, of the United State of Travancore and Cochin with a common Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. Article III provided that as from the appointed day (i.e., 1st July, 1949) all rights, authority and jurisdiction belonging to the Ruler of either of the covenanting State........