MANU/DE/3131/2010

True Court CopyTMMIPR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI

FAO (OS) No. 352/2010

Decided On: 01.11.2010

Appellants: Marico Limited Vs. Respondent: Agro Tech Foods Limited

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Valmiki J. Mehta

JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed with a prayer to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 23.4.2010 disposing of an application for injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff in a suit for infringement of trademark, passing off, dilution etc., and by which order the learned Single Judge dismissed the injunction application of the plaintiff. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge also allowed the application of the respondent/defendant for vacation of the injunction and vacated the ex parte interim order dated 28.8.2009. By the impugned order the learned Single judge has held that no case for infringement is made out on account of the use of the expression "LOW ABSORB" by the respondent-defendant which was alleged to be deceptively similar to the registered trademarks "LOSORB" and "LO-SORB" of the appellant-plaintiff. The learned Single Judge also held that use of the expression "LOW ABSORB" by the defendant will not amount to passing off although the plaintiff also claimed a right in the unregistered trademark "LOW ABSORB".

2. The relevant facts of the case are that appellant-plaintiff got registered the Trademarks "LOSORB" and "LO-SORB" for different products in class-29 viz Oil, Ghee etc. effective from 28.05.2001. The appellant claimed that it coined the word marks which have been registered by it. The registered marks were used in relation to edible oil inasmuch as the edible oil contained an ingredient/anti foaming agent by which less or low oil was consumed by the product made by use of the edible oil. The edible oil sold also used the trademarks "Sweekar" & "Saffola" besides the subject registered trademarks "LOSORB" and LO-SORB'. The appellant in the plaint has referred to its extensive sales of the product by using of the registered trademarks and also reference has been made to large amounts spent towards advertisements. The relevant paras of the plaint are paras 11 and 12 which read as under:

11. Given below are the sales figures for the edible oil on which LOW ABSORB and/or LOSORB marks(s) were used for the period October 2001-Quarter I of FY 2010:

FINANCIAL YEAR

MONTHS

VOLUME

VALUE (IN CRORES)

2001-02

April to March

21898

102.48

2002-03

April to March

19665

92.41

2003-04

April to March

20865

120.86

2004-05

April to March

19797

116.10

2005-06

April to March

31414

195.55

2006-07

April to March

46554

323.49