MANU/SC/0426/2005

True Court CopyTM English

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 695 of 2004

Decided On: 19.07.2005

Appellants: Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Respondent: Gnanambigai Mills Ltd.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
S.N. Variava and A.R. Lakshmanan

ORDER

1. This Appeal is against the Judgment of the Madras High Court dated 7th August, 2002. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:-

The Employees of Respondent Company raised a demand for increase of wages. The dispute was referred to the Special Tribunal, Madras for adjudication. By virtue of Section 10-B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which had been introduced in the State of Tamil Nadu, the Government passed orders dated 15th July, 1985 and 29th July, 1985 directing certain payments to be made to the workmen pending the disputes. Both orders contained a clause that any money paid in pursuance of the order could be deducted by the employer from out of the monetary benefits to which the employee would become entitled under the Award which may be passed by the Tribunal.

2. At this stage, it would be convenient to set out Section 10-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, under which the Orders were passed. Section 10-B reads as follows:-

"10-B Power to issue order regarding terms and conditions of service pending settlement of disputes. -

(1) Where an industrial dispute has been referred by the State Government to a Labour Court or a Tribunal under sub-section (1) of Section 10 and if, in the opinion of the State Government it is necessary or expedient so to do for securing the public safety or convenience or the maintenance of public order or supplies and services essential to the life of the community or for maintaining employment or industrial peace in the establishment concerning which such reference has been made, it may, by general or special order, make provision, -

(a)for requiring the employer or workman or both to observe such terms and conditions of employment as may be specified in the order or as may be determined in accordance with the order, including payment of money by the employer to any person who is or has been a workman;

(b) for requiring any public utility service not to close or remain closed and to work or continue to work on such terms and conditions as may be specified in the order; and

(c) for any incidental or supplementary matter which appears to it to be necessary or expedient for the purpose of the order;

Provided that no order made under this sub-section shall require any employer to observe terms and conditions of employment less favourable to the workman than those which were applicable to them at any time within three months immediately preceding the date of the order.

Explanation. - For the purpose of this sub-section, "public utility service" means -

(i) any section of an industrial establishment on the working of which the safety of the establishment or the workman employed therein depends;

(ii) any industry which supplies power, light or water to the public;

(iii) any industry which has been declared by the State Government to be a public utility service for the purpose of this Act.

(2) An order made under sub-section (1) shall cease to operate on the expiry of a period of six months from the date of the order or on the date of the award of the Labour Court or the Tri........