Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Tarun Chatterjee and P. Sathasivam JUDGMENT
P. Sathasivam, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Appellant - Venture Global Engineering (in short "VGE"), a company incorporated in the United States of America with its principal office at 33662, James J Pampo Drive, Fraser, Michigan, USA 48026 through its Constituted Attorney, Mr. Pradeep Yadav filed this appeal challenging the final order and judgment dated 27.2.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in City Civil Court Appeal No. 26 of 2007 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed their appeal.
3. The facts, which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal, are as under:
On 20.10.1999, Appellant-Company and respondent No. 1- Satyam Computer Services Limited (in short "SCSL"), a registered company having its office at Mayfair center, S.P. Road, Secunderabad entered into a Joint Venture Agreement to constitute a company named Satyam Venture Engineering Services Ltd. respondent No. 2 herein (in short "SVES") in which both the appellant and respondent No. 1 have 50 per cent equity shareholding. Another agreement was also executed between the parties on the same day being the Shareholders Agreement (in short "SHA") which provides that disputes have to be resolved amicably between the parties and failing such resolution, the disputes are to be referred to arbitration. Section 11. 05 of the SHA provides for certain terms and conditions as regards the resolution of the disputes. In February, 2005, disputes arose between the parties. Respondent No. 1 alleged that the appellant had committed an event of default under the SHA owing to several venture companies becoming insolvent and they had exercised its option to purchase the appellant-company's shares in SVES at its book value. On 25.07.2005, respondent No. 1 filed a request for arbitration with the London Court of International Arbitration which appointed Mr. Paul B Hannon as sole arbitrator on 10.9.2005. The sole Arbitrator on 3.4.2006 passed an award directing the appellant VGE to transfer the shares to respondent No. 1. On 14.4.2006, respondent No. 1 filed a petition to recognize and enforce the award before the United States District Court, Eastern District Court of Michigan (US Court). The appellant entered appearance to defend this proceeding before the US Court by filing a cross petition. In the said petition, it objected to the enforcement of the Award which ordered transfer of shares which was in violation of Indian Laws and Regulations specifically the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (in short "FEMA") and its notifications. The appellant filed a suit being O.S. No. 80 of 2006 before the 1st Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad on 28.4.2006 seeking declaration to set aside the award and permanent injunction on the transfer of shares under the Award. On 15.6.2006, the District Court passed an ad-interim ex parte order of injunction, inter alia, restraining respondent No. 1 from seeking or effecting the transfer of shares either under the terms of the Award or otherwise. Challenging the said order, respondent No. 1 filed an appeal before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. The High Court admitted respondents ........