MANU/SC/0632/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal Nos. 1418 of 1995 Etc. Etc.

Decided On: 03.02.1995

Appellants: Isha Marbles Vs. Respondent: Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
P.B. Sawant, S. Mohan and K.S. Paripoornan

JUDGMENT

S. Mohan, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. All these appeals can be dealt with by a common judgment since the g issue that arises for our consideration is one and the same, namely, whether the auction purchaser is liable to meet the liability of old consumer of electricity to the premises which is purchased by him in the auction sale from Bihar State Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the 'Corporation') under Section 29(1) of the Bihar State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation Act)?

Civil Appeal No. 1418 of 1995 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 617 of 1992 (Mis Isha Marbles) :

3. In this case, the appellant is a purchaser of the mortgaged assets of M/s. Patel Industries. Daltonganj in an open auction sale held by the Corporation Act. The appellant has paid a substantial sum towards the said transaction and thereafter got the possession of the industry on 31.1.1991. However, the electrical connection of the premises was disconnected when the appellant got possession of the said unit. The appellant was called upon to discharge all the liabilities of the previous consumer. This was challenged in C.W.J.C. No. 1536 of 1991 before the High Court of Patna, Ranchi Bench, Ranchi. The stand taken by the writ petitioner before the High Court was, there is a transfer of a unit; it had not been supplied with electricity; hence, it had no occasion to consume electricity; and as transferee it is not liable for energy consumed before such transfer. The writ petition was dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court holding that the Bihar State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') would be entitled to take action in accordance with law.

4. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment the appellant has come in appeal before this Court.

Civil Appeal No. 1420 of 1995 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 16227 of 1992 : Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors. v. M/s. Waxpol Industries Ltd. and Anr.:

5. In this case, the facts are slightly different. The Bihar Financial Corporation sanctioned loan to M/s. Neo Chemicals & Metal Products (P) Ltd. for setting up a unit for manufacture of Graphite Beneficiation. The said unit occupied Plot Nos. 1819 and 1820 at P.O. Village Booti, District Ranchi, Bihar. For non-payment of electricity bills the electricity was disconnected. They were outstanding to the tune of Rs. 2,35,924.78 against such electricity consumption charges. The Corporation had advanced a sum of Rs. 3,40,000 to M/s. Neo Chemicals. To secure this loan, the properties of the company had been hypothecated /mortgaged. In order to realise this sum the properties were sought to be sold under Section 29 of the Corporation Act. The sale was through an advertisement. The Waxpol Industries, the respondent, filed its tender. That was the highest. Therefore, the properties were sold in favour of the respondent for a consideration of Rs. 2,97,578.27.

6. Waxpol Industries applied for electricity connection to the Board. After the purchase, in that application, Column No. 6 required Waxpol Industries to state whether it would undertake to clear the previous dues. As against this, it was stated "does not apply". Therefore, on 3.1.89, the Board informed Waxpol Industries that it was unable to res........