Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
P. Sathasivam, C.J.I., Ranjan Gogoi and N.V. Ramana

JUDGMENT

Ranjan Gogoi, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.04.2011 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh affirming the order of conviction passed by the Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB cases, City Civil Court Hyderabad, whereby the accused Appellant has been found guilty of commission of the offences Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i)(ii) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short "the Act"). The accused Appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for each of the offences and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months more.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused Appellant was, at the relevant point of time, working as a Mandal Revenue officer (MRO) in the Ranga Reddy District of the State of Andhra Pradesh. The complainant K. Venkataiah (PW-2) had a fair price shop in Dadupally village. On 8.11.1995, the complainant, it is alleged, had approached the accused Appellant for release of essential commodities against his shop for the month of November, 1995. The accused Appellant, it is claimed, demanded a bribe of Rs. 250/- to issue the release order. As the complainant was not willing to pay the said amount, he had approached listed witness No. 9 K. Narsinga Rao, (since deceased) Deputy Superintendent of Police, ACB, Hyderabad on 9.11.1995 and submitted a written complaint (Exbt. P-11) before him. According to the prosecution, LW-9 after verifying the contents of the complaint registered a case and issued Exhibit P-12 (FIR). LW-9 directed the complainant to come with the bribe amount on 13.11.995. It is also alleged that LW-9 summoned PW-1, S. Hanuma Reddy, Deputy Director of Insurance to act as a panch witness and explained the details of the complaint (Exbt. P-11) to him. Furthermore, according to ........