Supreme Court

Amanullah and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.

MANU/SC/0403/2016

12.04.2016

Criminal

Courts should be liberal in allowing third-party locus standi

Courts should be “liberal in allowing any third party” with a bona fide connection with the matter so long as it ‘advance[s] substantial justice’, the Supreme Court urged. However, such authority was to be with exercised with courts taking due care, it cautioned, to ensure that persons with personal grievances were not allowed to abuse the legal system, nor those who were unconnected with the matter. Rather than enumerate a list of persons who have locus standi, the court tendered that who all would have locus to maintain an appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution would depend on the facts of each case.

The Court had heard the appeal against an order of the High Court quashing the cognisance order of the magistrate against a charge of murder. It concluded that the High Court’s decision was in error, on an appraisal of material placed before it. Witness testimony and evidence collected by the investigating officer was correctly considered by the CJM before taking cognisance.

Relevant

Rajiv Thapar v. Madan Lal Kapoor MANU/SC/0053/2013
P.S.R. Sadhanantham v. Arunanchalam MANU/SC/0083/1980
Section 482 CrPC Act

Locus standi

Tags : Locus standi cognizance third party

Share :